Multimedia advice
Multimedia investment checklist
I have been reading oodles of research papers lately in preparation for my master’s project. One article in particular by Laura Ruel and Nora Paul caught my attention because it included a checklist at the end to determine whether or not it is worth investing in multimedia for a particular story. Included below is the checklist they created, as well as some of their findings from their 2007 DiSEL (Digital Story Effects Lab) study.
I encourage you to read the full article, “Multimedia storytelling: when is it worth it? ” at Online Journalism Review .
“Should we present this story as an interactive?
Before undertaking any large story project be sure to ask:
Who is the target audience for this story?
What do we hope to accomplish in telling this story to them?
Then use this decision-tool to see which approach to storytelling is best supported by the research in these studies:
Does the story concern elaborate or unfamiliar processes / procedures?
Yes – 1 point
No – no points
Is the level of interest in the topic high enough that people would be willing to figure out story navigation?
Yes – 1 point
No – no points
Does the story have value beyond the first few weeks? Is it likely to be a topic in the news again?
Yes – 1 point
No – no points
Is entertaining the audience more important than simply informing?
Yes – 1 point
No – no points
Is it important that the audience be able to recall specific facts from the story?
Yes – no points
No – 1 point
If the story is told in separate components, is it essential that all the components be viewed by the audience?
Yes – no points
No – 1 point
Do you hope the audience recalls where they saw the information?
Yes – 1 point
No – no points
If you get five or more points, then you should strongly consider an interactive story approach.
Findings behind the questions …
Interactive presentations work best when you want users to …
spend more time with the presentation;
describe the experience as “enjoyable;”
recall more of the information;
recall your brand;
feel entertained.
Static presentations work best when you want users to …
“click to” all of the presentation’s materials;
preceive the site navigation as easy.
Either form is equally effective if you want to …
increase the likelihood a user would return to the site.”
Other posts that might interest you:
Subscribe to RSS Feed English
Español
Archives Select Month February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
[...] original here: Multimedia investment checklist By admin | category: Review? | tags: castration, checklist, cleveland-browns, [...]
[...] original aquí: Multimedia investment checklist By admin | category: Review? | tags: castration, checklist, cleveland-browns,[...]
[...] Read the original: Multimedia investment checklist [...]
[...] Lea el post original: Multimedia investment checklist [...]
[...] See some-more here: Innovative Interactivity | Multimedia investment checklist [...]
[...] Vea más aquí: Innovative Interactivity | Multimedia investment checklist [...]
[...] rest is here: Innovative Interactivity | Multimedia investment checklist Categories: Investment Tags: how-people, interactivity, open-forum, the-dynamics, tracy, [...]
[...] el resto aquí: Innovative Interactivity | Multimedia investment checklist Categories: Investment Tags: how-people, interactivity, open-forum, the-dynamics, tracy, [...]
What a welcome blast from the past. I remember seeing this in the paper but it had just fallen out of my head. A great reminder. Thanks Tracy
Qué buen recuerdo del pasado. Recuerdo haber visto esto en el ensayo, pero se me había olvidado. Un gran recuerdo. Gracias Tracy.
[...] Innovative Interactivity | Multimedia investment checklist – [...]