Multimedia advice
Multimedia investment checklist
I have been reading oodles of research papers lately in preparation for my master’s project. One article in particular by Laura Ruel and Nora Paul caught my attention because it included a checklist at the end to determine whether or not it is worth investing in multimedia for a particular story. Included below is the checklist they created, as well as some of their findings from their 2007 DiSEL (Digital Story Effects Lab) study.
I encourage you to read the full article, “Multimedia storytelling: when is it worth it?” at Online Journalism Review.
“Should we present this story as an interactive?
Before undertaking any large story project be sure to ask:
- Who is the target audience for this story?
- What do we hope to accomplish in telling this story to them?
Then use this decision-tool to see which approach to storytelling is best supported by the research in these studies:
- Does the story concern elaborate or unfamiliar processes / procedures?
- Yes – 1 point
- No – no points
- Is the level of interest in the topic high enough that people would be willing to figure out story navigation?
- Yes – 1 point
- No – no points
- Does the story have value beyond the first few weeks? Is it likely to be a topic in the news again?
- Yes – 1 point
- No – no points
- Is entertaining the audience more important than simply informing?
- Yes – 1 point
- No – no points
- Is it important that the audience be able to recall specific facts from the story?
- Yes – no points
- No – 1 point
- If the story is told in separate components, is it essential that all the components be viewed by the audience?
- Yes – no points
- No – 1 point
- Do you hope the audience recalls where they saw the information?
- Yes – 1 point
- No – no points
If you get five or more points, then you should strongly consider an interactive story approach.
Findings behind the questions …
Interactive presentations work best when you want users to …
- spend more time with the presentation;
- describe the experience as “enjoyable;”
- recall more of the information;
- recall your brand;
- feel entertained.
Static presentations work best when you want users to …
- “click to” all of the presentation’s materials;
- preceive the site navigation as easy.
Either form is equally effective if you want to …
- increase the likelihood a user would return to the site.”
Other posts that might interest you:
[...] original here: Multimedia investment checklist By admin | category: Review? | tags: castration, checklist, cleveland-browns, [...]
[...] original aquí: Multimedia investment checklist By admin | category: Review? | tags: castration, checklist, cleveland-browns,[...]
[...] Read the original: Multimedia investment checklist [...]
[...] Lea el post original: Multimedia investment checklist [...]
[...] See some-more here: Innovative Interactivity | Multimedia investment checklist [...]
[...] Vea más aquí: Innovative Interactivity | Multimedia investment checklist [...]
[...] rest is here: Innovative Interactivity | Multimedia investment checklist Categories: Investment Tags: how-people, interactivity, open-forum, the-dynamics, tracy, [...]
[...] el resto aquí: Innovative Interactivity | Multimedia investment checklist Categories: Investment Tags: how-people, interactivity, open-forum, the-dynamics, tracy, [...]
What a welcome blast from the past. I remember seeing this in the paper but it had just fallen out of my head. A great reminder. Thanks Tracy
Qué buen recuerdo del pasado. Recuerdo haber visto esto en el ensayo, pero se me había olvidado. Un gran recuerdo. Gracias Tracy.
[...] Innovative Interactivity | Multimedia investment checklist – [...]